The mathematician looking at the world, perhaps the Universe, looks at it mathematically, perhaps geometrically. Should he look at it any other way, it might surprise him. A farmer perhaps looks at the world organically, into its nature and the fertilization process, along with its biological, and geographical natural surroundings; as well as the birds and the bees, and the way of the blossom. The question may be: what is incomplete, and what is not? Is their view without hypocrisy? Or pretense! Is there a better view? So, does the mathematician rely on what is already in place? Yes, of course he does, or there'd be nothing to calculate. Now for the farmer, must he not also rely on that which is already in place, beautiful, available to work with, and in blossom; so it would seem so?



from Arts-and-Entertainment Articles from EzineArticles.com http://ift.tt/X2VymT

via IFTTT